Ethereum's deal with scaling by many Layer 2 networks, each of which has their very own transaction processing speed and parameters, may give the network an infinite variety of unique high-throughout chains, similar to Anurag Arjun, co-founder of accessible, a uniform chain absurd solution.
In an interview with CoinTelegraph, Arjun admitted that Ethereum and high -throughout competitors with monolithic architecture are fundamentally different products. Ethereum's decision to scale through a wealth of L2 solutions gives it an neglected quality:
“The underestimated great thing about this roll-up-centered roadmap architecture is that several teams can experiment with different execution environments and different block times.”
This enables a wide range of high-throughput sidecins as an alternative of only a single architecture on monolithic layer-1, added the chief. Without real interoperability, switching between L2S stays as complex because the bridging between different blockchain ecosystems, warned Arjun.
An overview of the Ethereum's Layer 2 Ecosystem. Source: L2Beat
The perspective of the co-founder of the co-founder corresponds to the numerous critics of the L2-focused approach from Ethereum, who say that the scaling solutions of the network are silo liquidity and ultimately corrosive for the essential layer. Ethereum's critics argue that L2S is considered one of the foremost causes for the poor price -performance of Ether (Eth) last yr.
The Ethereum fees drop to 5 years of deep stalls
In April 2025, the fees for the Ethereum Layer-1 network fell to 5 years, with the common transaction fee was around 0.16 USD.
According to Brian Quinlivan, the marketing director for the Santiment Onchain Analytics company, reducing the fee signals reduced the demand for the essential class and the decreasing investor interest in Ethereum.
The every day transaction fees of Ethereum Network were significantly dropped within the second Queller 2025. Source: token Terminal
“This great reduction in fees coincides with fewer individuals who interact with intelligent contracts,” wrote Quinlivan in a blog post dated April 16.
These intelligent contract interactions include transactions about decentralized financing, digital collectibles similar to non-fungable tokens (NFTS) and other digital asset sectors added the Santiment Executive.
The declining transaction fees of ether and the reduced retail rates of interest have also caused many institutional investors to cut back their ether assignments and to issue revised price prospects for the second largest digital asset in response to market capitalization.