Opinion of: Igor Mandrigin, co -founder and CTPO from gateway.fm
Every few weeks appears to be one other layer 2 that loads of web3 industry commentators who’re concerned about fragmentation. In a report recently reported by Gemini institutional report, it was actually discovered how a brand new L2 solution from Ethereum L2 is launched every 19 days. In response to the apparently countless conveyor belt of latest ZKEVMS and optimistic rollups that come onto the market, the choir of criticism continues: “This is certainly the saturation point, no more chains are required.”
Some of essentially the most pronounced critics of L2S argue that L2S is superfluous, but this can be a narrow considering. In some ways, the concept is that creating recent L2S needs to be slowed down, as to argue that there have been too many web sites in 1998. The spread of L2S doesn’t mean that the Web3 room is bloated too excessively or fragmented. The variety of chains today will not be too many. It is ridiculous and the early innovations of a multi-year explosion are currently in a special, modular blockchain infrastructure.
The rise of L2S is much from a brief fashion appearance
While some claim that this L2 increase that now we have experienced is simply a brief frenzy of Defi, it is de facto an infrastructure expansion of corporate quality, since banks (including Deutsche Bank), game studios (game activities in some L2 blockchains in February 2025) by over 20,000% in February 2025), Logistics and Global Manufacturers and Global Manufacturers, and global manufacturers, those on the networks, the logistical networks, and the worldwide manufacturers who rose to the networks and global manufacturers, and the logical networks and the worldwide manufacturers who rose to the networks and global manufacturers, the logics and the worldwide manufacturers.
Sectors similar to banks and logistics which can be normally risk avers don’t make a very powerful tech turns evenly. They do that because they and in lots of cases public blockchains don’t meet their needs. Return to their inherent risk averse DNA, large firms and institutions in these sectors generally don’t want to construct on common L1s with a general purpose. Instead, you want to to make use of your individual chains, where you possibly can enjoy customer -specific performance, predictable costs, compliance and privacy on the granular level.
This give attention to proprietary networks will not be only a web3 matter. Let's give it some thought. Do Facebook, Netflix and JPmorgan have co-moderator for geocities? Of course not, why should Web3 be different? Common L1S and monolithic architectures can have worked for early tokens experiments and composable Defi -primitive. However, realistically, you can’t realistically support the complexity of real firms, the complexity, regulatory stress or the contractual requirements.
The growing viability of L2S
Thanks to modular stacks, Rollup-As-A-Service platforms and groundbreaking zero-knowledge proof technology, spiders of a dedicated chain is becoming increasingly viable and accessible to a big selection of firms in the whole range of industry. If the infrastructure improves, the prices for the beginning and maintenance of specialised chains may also be reduced, in order that a major increase within the variety of L2S will be expected over time.
Youngest: DEVS introduce Ethereum R1 Layer-2 scale solution
Some spectators will argue that this future for users who’re forced to leap between chains, confuse and concern concerns about liquidity fragmentation and the spread of tradable assets on several platforms. These are short -sighted concerns. We construct up within the direction of seamless interoperability through joint settlement layers, minimized confidence and uniform account abstraction. Ultimately, the tip user doesn’t matter whether he’s on Rollup #4.318 or Chain No. 9.072. You will simply handle ease and be satisfied with it.
In the identical way as Cloud Computing, Hyperskala unlocked by abstrax on the hardware layer, unlock modular blockchains hyperscale for value transmission, the output of assets and the programmable trust. Regardless of what the doubters say, specialized L2s is not going to be mutually agitated. They will serve different industries, jurisdiction and applications. There is not any reason why an L2 for prime frequency trading with an L2 for national land registers cannot easily coexist.
We don’t drown in chains-we are hardly an ankle in the massive scheme of things. Anyone who seriously relies on consolidation or a magical “winner-take-all” chain only relies against scale and sovereignty. The real bet is tons of of L2S and 1000’s of applications as a part of a modular, scalable future.
Opinion of: Igor Mandrigin, co -founder and CTPO from gateway.fm.
This article serves general information purposes and mustn’t be considered legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions which can be expressed listed here are solely that of the writer and don’t necessarily reflect the views and opinions of cointelegraph or don’t necessarily represent them.
