Opinion of: Steven Smith, head of the protocol and applied research, tools for humanity
Blockchains were developed as trust systems which might be transparent, decentralized and accessible. However, the age of the AI ​​has introduced significant latest challenges. Almost half of all the web traffic is generated by Bots, whereby as much as 80% of the blockchain transactions are actually automated and the AI ​​agents make up essentially the most onchain activities.
While some bots serve legitimate and helpful purposes, others – akin to those used for the creation of airdrop farming and faux account – can increase networks, increase fees and monopolize space and resources.
It is as a result of the person to guard the blockchains we all know and love, and to be certain that the people usually are not disadvantaged by automated systems, isolated from the consequences of maximum extractable value attacks and failures and freed from the necessity to pay considerable gas fees that must be included in a block.
The takeover of the bot is already here
AI bots are at all times essential for networks and the position of promoting more sophisticated heroic deeds, dominating the trade volume, increasing gas fees and manipulating decentralized financial markets (Defi).
In some cases, the failure rates rose within the networks as a result of bot-induced overload over 75%. Even Ethereum's Mempool is increasingly flooded with automated transactions and forces human users to compete in a detailed block room.
The problem extends beyond blockchain networks – it affects all the economy. AI-powered bots are intended to disturb traditional banking and financial services, which threatens the fundamentals of the management of cash and transactions.
It is just a matter of time before poor actors provide latest AI-controlled fraud tools on a scale and create an unprecedented security shield for financial institutions, corporations and users alike.
This has already began. In 2024, AI-controlled Botnets fueled a rise within the distributed denial of service attacks against the banking and financial services industry.
When measures are taken, people risk control of decentralized and standard financial systems for automated systems which might be optimized for speed and scaling – not for fairness or accessibility.
The scalability alone won’t solve this problem
So far, the response to those problems has focused on scalability. Layer 2 solutions, rollups and high-performance execution clients make transactions faster and cheaper.
However, scaling with out a concentrate on human users results in unintentional consequences. Lower fees mean that attackers may cause a whole lot of grief for low costs, and bots can flood more easily. In the meantime, faster transactions KI dealers could make human investors write even faster.
Youngest: Don't be afraid of quantum computers
This has already played repeatedly. A spam attack on ZCash disturbed its blockchain. During his token start, Manta Network suffered a DDOS attack, slowing down the payments and frustrating users. Bots were used on Ethereum to control gas prices in high traffic times, which led to delayed transactions and better transaction fees for real people.
While scalability is critical, it’s equally vital to prioritize one other basic element of blockchain design: proof-of-human.
Human infrastructure
The human infrastructure is a mechanism that digitally checks humanity and uniqueness of an individual. This is the important thing to keeping control of blockchain systems in human hands and real people give power to be certain that blockchains don’t turn out to be automated playgrounds for bots -especially if AI agents proceed to scale.
Proof-of-Human systems be certain that the blockchain architecture develops with a human approach. Nettings should provide guaranteed block room for verified human users to be certain that automated trade bots don’t advance significant transactions.
By introducing gas subsidies for human users, it could also prevent them from being overloaded in times of maximum networks. Optimized customers can improve efficiency and at the identical time implement protection against bot-controlled spam.
The blockchain architecture has made remarkable progress in scalability, interoperability and security. We still must guarantee positive experiences for humans. As a industry, it’s of fundamental importance to supply the chance to distinguish between real people and bots online to be certain that the sector can proceed to grow in the long term.
The alternative belongs to us. We can allow unproductive bots to take over our networks, to get human users out and to undermine the core promise of decentralization. Or we are able to implement the obligatory parameters to maintain blockchains in a human center and to make sure greater control over productive bots to make sure fairer access, security and sustainability.
Now there’s time to act. The way forward for blockchain and the achievement of more people within the damage depend upon it.
Opinion of: Steven Smith, head of the protocol and applied research, tools for humanity.
This article serves general information purposes and shouldn’t be considered legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions which might be expressed listed here are solely that of the writer and don’t necessarily reflect the views and opinions of cointelegraph or don’t necessarily represent them.
