Trusted editorial content reviewed by leading industry experts and experienced editors. Ad Disclosure
A brand new round of debate over quantum computing and Bitcoin has reportedly brought technical issues into market conversations.
Some investors say the threat is close enough to affect the value. Charles Edwards, founding father of Capriole, warned that Bitcoin could fall below $50,000 by 2028 if the network isn’t made quantum ready.
Developers urge caution
Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin Core developer and co-founder of custodian Casa, has argued that the migration to post-quantum cryptography won’t occur quickly.
Lopp told the followers
He agreed with Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, who also said that the threat isn’t short-term but ought to be kept in mind.
No, quantum computers won’t break Bitcoin within the near future. We will proceed to watch their development.
But thoughtful changes to the protocol (and an unprecedented migration of funds) could easily take 5 to 10 years.
We should hope for one of the best but prepare for the worst.
— Jameson Lopp (@lopp) December 21, 2025
Division of community over timing
There is reportedly a widening divide in how the community views the schedule. Some enterprise capitalists and investment firms say quantum risk is imminent and ought to be priced in now.
On the opposite hand, long-time Bitcoin supporters query the urgency. Pierre Rochard argued that quantum-resistant solutions will be funded by nonprofits or VC funding, and he suggested that an attack could be so costly that it will require support at the federal government level.
BTCUSD is currently trading at $89,951. Chart: TradingView
JAN3 CEO Samson Mow countered with a transparent statement about current machines, saying they “can’t factor the number 21 – not 21 million – 21” to clarify how far current quantum hardware is from cracking Bitcoin’s cryptography. Andreas M. Antonopoulos also weighed in, declaring that upgrades are possible before there’s an actual threat.
What it means to upgrade Bitcoin
Changing Bitcoin's cryptography isn’t the identical as updating peculiar software. According to developers, the distributed nature of the network, the range of wallet software used, and the numerous holders who don’t actively manage keys make a large-scale migration difficult.
BIP 360, a proposal that will add a quantum-ready signature method for BTC, has been pushed by a couple of personalities. Charles Edwards has called on node operators to implement BIP 360 to hurry up adoption, while others say enforcement and coordination could be difficult and will take years.
Requests a protocol change
Market watchers should note the difference between theory and evidence. The technical camp says it's time to rigorously plan and implement changes. The investment camp warns that market confidence could falter if motion isn’t taken quickly.
Calls to motion include funding research, testing signature replacements, and developing migration tools that will be utilized by exchanges and wallets. The debate has turn out to be public because price concerns are a matter of practical, not only academic, interest.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
Editorial process At Bitcoinist, the main target is on providing thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We maintain strict sourcing standards and each page is rigorously reviewed by our team of top technology experts and experienced editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance and value of our content to our readers.
