Opinion of: Chris Jenkins, consultant of Pocket Network
Tim Berners-Lees Vision of the World Wide Web is dead. Instead of an open and accessible global information system, the online is controlled by centralized global data conglomerates, which not only restrict freedom of speech, but in addition monetize your data as an admission price. Web2 corporations have built walled gardens with massive information asymmetry between corporations and users.
Blockchain-based decentralized technical blockchain questions the established order and offers an alternative choice to the closed infrastructure of Web2.
It enables developers and engineers to construct a zzzensa-resistant and accessible web open-data web so as to commit themselves to the reason for freedom of speech. The open source technology creates a paradigmatic change in a good and integrative Internet by which central web corporations don’t determine the terms.
A vision postponed
In 1989, the invention of Berners-Lee created a virtual space for cooperation, sharing and learning from one another. The first iteration of the online was based on openness, by which everyone contributed to information, working together, working together and having fun with the identical options.
The Internet is not any longer freed from charge in 2025. The Brute Force from Capital has encouraged central corporations to exercise authoritarian control over data and knowledge flows.
Unfortunately, these corporations have acquired their power and resources from non -conscious users who unknowingly contributed to their capital accumulation strategies. Web2 corporations secretly collect data from users without fair remuneration and use them as a weapon to manage the user behavior.
Companies use user data to coach opaque algorithms and supply information “discovery” to form the beliefs and emotions of the users. This practice is principally visible on centralized social media platforms corresponding to Facebook, Instagram and X, with several scandals and pending litigation eroding user trust.
For example, Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, received 11 complaints from members of the European Union in June 2024. The complaints coping with personal data in addition to articles and pictures to coach the AI models from Meta without consent and violate the laws of the info protection discs of the EU.
Youngest: The case against Pavel Durov and why it can be crucial for crypto
The Cambridge Analytica scandal has shown how corporations provide data on the design of political perspectives and election results. These corporations also construct defined stories and form market behavior by promoting or undermining curated reports and sometimes shaping public perspectives on health and business data.
According to its digital markets act, the European Commission has initiated an investigation of the non -compliance with Apple, Meta, Amazon and Alphabet's practices. Meta also made a nice of 1.3 billion US dollars for the failure of the info protection regulations.
In this environment, “freedom of speech” stays a far-from dream, since the whole tech stack of accessibility and openness is hostile. In order to acknowledge the vision of Berners-Lee, apps must use a decentralized tech stack and construct up on an open architecture from scratch.
Make the web free (again)
The tech stack of an app consists of the back and front, data storage and content delief network (CDN). Web2 platforms depend upon a centralized tech stack that endangers freedom of speech, while most apps with blockchain providers use a censor-resistant decentralized tech stack with high availability.
Some decentralized applications (DAPPS) construct their front end at a decentralized interface. However, most of her backend continues to be on the centralized data infrastructure.
Despite their censorship weak spots and individual error points, decentralized applications (DAPPS) use continuously centralized cloud providers and data hosting platforms. These varieties of attack vectors make projects corresponding to Tornado Cash for the changing moods of state actors.
Shifting to open source protocols for distributed data storage corresponding to IPFS (Interplanetary File System) and Filecoin stops the philosophy of philosophy of philosophy for DAPPs. These protocols offer a censor resistant, manipulation -proof storage device that continues to be accessible without arbitrary failures.
DAPPS also use Centralized Remote Procedure Call providers (RPC) to supply data from the back-end to the front-end interface, specifically via several networks. However, any failure or attack like that on X can result in downtimes, inaccuracies, data gaps and separate information flows. If it doesn't appear to be much, remember downtime or inaccuracies in decentralized funds can cost billions.
Decentralized protocols avoid these situations by transforming the accessibility of the info and transmitting channels with independent node operators. Data queries are distributed via the network, which eliminates a single dropout point and uninterrupted data availability is provided. It is much more vital that it protects the rights of freedom of speech, since no single knot can block or hinder the info flow and the network can also be accessible when several nodes go offline.
CDNS, one other crucial component for the services of user inquiries, can turn out to be inaccessible as a result of the market pressure or political influence. Obsolist decisions of sessions with closed doors determine data flows on CDNs without security in the knowledge flows.
Start with the fundamentals
Decentralized protocols remove the necessity for a centralized decision -making process by accessing apps directly without an intermediary. These profitablyless protocols mix open source data and repair providers with users and applications, which eliminates human interaction and the associated problems.
Blockchain-powered platforms form the inspiration for a decentralized tech stack that promotes freedom of speech and is just not controlled by centralized web2 corporations. These uneventful protocols construct an open source world and convey the Internet back into the vision of Berners-Lee from a worldwide and accessible network.
Opinion of: Chris Jenkins, consultant of the Pocket Network.
This article serves general information purposes and shouldn’t be thought to be legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions which might be expressed listed here are solely that of the creator and don’t necessarily reflect the views and opinions of cointelegraph or don’t necessarily represent them.
