ETH price rose above $2,150 as Bitcoin and US stock markets rallied. But does the info show whether derivatives traders have already turned bullish?
Key Takeaways:
-
Ethereum maintains dominance in its total value locked metric, but faces scrutiny on Layer 2 scaling.
-
ETH inflation rose to 0.8% as on-chain activity slowed, while macroeconomic fears within the US kept derivatives markets in bearish territory.
Ether (ETH) price managed to reclaim $2,100 after plunging 43% in nine days, with the altcoin hitting a low of $1,750 on Friday. Despite a 22% rebound after hitting its lowest price since April 2025, ETH derivatives markets proceed to reflect investor fears of further downside. Regardless of whether the macroeconomic environment causes investor concern, the possibilities of sustained upward momentum for ETH within the near term remain slim.
ETH 2-month futures premium on an annual basis. Source: laevitas.ch
ETH monthly futures traded at a 3% premium to regular spot markets on Monday, below the neutral threshold of 5%. This lack of optimism amongst Ether traders has been consistent over the past month and has shown no signs of improving whilst the worth fell towards $1,800. Unless the bulls intervene and show strong risk-taking at these levels, the bears are prone to remain on top of things.
ETH/USD (orange) vs. total crypto capitalization (blue). Source: TradingView
ETH underperformed the broader cryptocurrency market cap by 9% in 2026, leading investors to query what’s siphoning away capital. From a broader perspective, the declining interest in decentralized applications (DApps) just isn’t just affecting Ethereum. The network stays the dominant leader in total value locked (TVL) and fee generation when aggregating its Layer 2 solutions.
Blockchains sorted by TVL (left) and 30 day fees (right), USD. Source: DefiLlama
Deposits on the Ethereum base layer account for 58% of your entire blockchain industry; this number exceeds 65% when including Base, Arbitrum and Optimism. For example, the biggest application on Solana barely exceeds $2 billion in deposits. In comparison, the biggest DApp on the Ethereum base layer has a TVL of over $23 billion. Solanas Jupiter wouldn't even crack the highest 14 on Ethereum.
ETH supply growth and layer 2 Subsidies remain problematic
The Ethereum base layer ranked third in network fees, generating $19 million in 30 days, while the Layer 2 ecosystem contributed one other $14.6 million. Ethereum has come under fire for heavily subsidizing scalability through optimistic rollups – a method that Vitalik Buterin himself admits needs adjustment. Ethereum's co-founder argued on Tuesday that the network should prioritize base layer scalability.
According to Buterin, the Layer 2 path to decentralization turned out to be tougher than expected. According to reports, the present solutions are based on multisig-driven bridges, which doesn’t meet the safety standards called for in Ethereum's original vision. Buterin points out that this just isn’t the tip of Layer-2, because the demand for networks that supply data protection features and application-specific design will proceed, especially for non-financial use cases.
ETH supply change, 30 days. Source: ultraschall.money
Part of investors' disappointment could be explained by the incontrovertible fact that Ether's strategy didn’t change into deflationary, which is a secondary effect of the reduced activity of the Ethereum network. The integrated burning mechanism relies on the demand for base-level data processing. Without it, there shall be a net increase in ETH supply. Annual growth in total ETH issued reached 0.8% over the past 30 days, a major increase from last yr when corresponding inflation was near 0%.
Ether traders remain skeptical that a sustained recovery can occur within the near term on account of increased uncertainty within the US labor market and the long-term sustainability of investments in artificial intelligence infrastructure. Consequently, the weak ETH derivatives markets are a mirrored image of general risk aversion and a slowdown in on-chain activity – aspects that can likely take longer to stabilize.
This article doesn’t contain any investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading activity involves risks and readers should conduct their very own research when making their decision. While we attempt to supply accurate and up-to-date information, Cointelegraph doesn’t guarantee the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the knowledge in this text. This article may contain forward-looking statements which might be subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph won’t be answerable for any loss or damage arising out of your reliance on this information.
