HomeMiningBitcoin Mining Has Higher Emissions Than Beef Production

Bitcoin Mining Has Higher Emissions Than Beef Production

-

Introduction to Bitcoin Mining

Bitcoin mining in 2020 used more energy than Austria or Portugal, and its emissions as a proportion of market value were comparable to the meat industry, a brand new study has found. The research, published in Scientific Reports, calculated the energy intensity of Bitcoin mining and annual emissions from mining between 2016 and 2021. Using those figures, the researchers estimated the potential cost from climate and health impacts that those emissions would incur.

Key Findings

The study found that Bitcoin mining used, on average, greater than 75 terawatt-hours per 12 months — greater than the energy budget of some countries. Between 2016 and 2021, emissions to provide each coin increased from under a tonne to 113 tonnes per coin, in accordance with the researchers. When they compared the potential cost of climate damages from those emissions with other industry emissions, as a proportion of their market value, they found Bitcoin mining was more cost effective than fossil fuel production, but barely more costly than beef production.

The Energy-Intensive Model of Bitcoin

Bitcoin uses the "proof of labor" or PoW protocol. This gives the currency built-in security, but in addition makes it intentionally laborious to mine, in accordance with economist John Hawkins from the University of Canberra. Essentially, how proof of labor operates is transactions are verified by computers solving mathematical problems that, once solved, are easy to ascertain. But as mining competition grows, the system adjusts to make the equations tougher. That’s created an "arms race", Dr Hawkins said, with ever-more processing power needed to mine the coins.

The Environmental Impact

The code is wasteful by design, and can proceed to make use of more energy as mining competition grows. Though some cryptocurrency miners claim to make use of renewable energy for mining, placing more demand on the general grid still increased the demand for fossil fuels, said economist John Quiggin of the University of Queensland. "The excuses Bitcoin fans make, that they use renewable energy, sometimes don’t rise up," Professor Quiggin said.

Cleaner Alternatives

There are alternatives to the Bitcoin model. Ethereum, probably the most popular cryptocurrencies behind Bitcoin, has switched from proof of labor to "proof of stake", or PoS. Under that system, crypto transactions are validated by other Ethereum owners who stake large quantities of their blockchain tokens or coins, as collateral. Ethereum estimates the switch, which was made this 12 months, will reduce emissions by as much as 99 per cent.

The Challenge of Changing the Model

Though the switch in models appears to be going well for Ethereum, Dr Hawkins said it was a really difficult process, and there is more likely to be resistance throughout the crypto community to Bitcoin following suit. "Some people said it was like trying to vary the engine within the plane while it was flying," he said. "There are these hardline Bitcoin fanatics saying, ‘you may’t change Bitcoin.’" And since the cryptocurrency is a decentralized platform, it’s extremely difficult for governments to force them to vary their practices, he said.

Calls for Change

Greenpeace USA has launched a campaign called "Change the Code, Not the Climate" to attempt to pressure Bitcoin to vary to the same model to Ethereum. In a press release last month, Greenpeace USA special project manager Rolf Skar said it was incumbent on firms using Bitcoin to force the change. "We’re in a climate crisis and everybody has a responsibility to act," Mr Skar said. "With Ethereum’s move to an energy-efficient protocol, it is time for Bitcoin to vary. Companies promoting and making the most of Bitcoin, like Fidelity Investments, BlackRock, Paypal and Block, have a responsibility to be an element of constructing a greater, climate-friendly Bitcoin."

Conclusion

In conclusion, the energy-intensive model of Bitcoin mining has significant environmental impacts, and it is important to contemplate alternative models that may reduce emissions. The switch to proof of stake by Ethereum is a step in the precise direction, and it’s crucial for Bitcoin to follow suit. The crypto community, firms, and governments must work together to deal with the climate crisis and create a more sustainable future for cryptocurrencies.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

Ether vs. Bitcoin: ETH price poised for an 80 percent rally in 2026

Ethereum's Ether (ETH) token could rise over 80% against Bitcoin (BTC) in 2026, in accordance with a classic bullish reversal scenario unfolding on its long-term...

Crypto Mining Stocks to Rise Amid Bitcoin Price Crash

Introduction to Crypto Mining Stocks Despite Bitcoin's price dipping below $100,000 previously month, some crypto mining stocks are still showing upside potential. This is on account...

Bitcoin New Year bear flag triggers $76,000 BTC price goal next

Bitcoin (BTC) has a brand new goal of $76,000 as a bear flag pattern continues to be seen on the every day chart.Key points:Bitcoin gets...

Ether price motion predicts a triple-digit rally as ETH ETF inflows resume

Ether (ETH) price motion cooled this week following a pointy rejection from the $3,650-$3,350 supply zone, with the altcoin hovering near $3,200. The rejection coincided...

Most Popular

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 0.00000000000000 2.29%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 0.00000000000000 1.30%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.00000000000000 0.00%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.00000000000000 1.67%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 0.00000000000000 2.37%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.00000000000000 0.01%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 0.00000000000000 5.62%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 0.00000000000000 1.44%
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.00000000000000 0.93%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.00000000000000 2.13%