Opinion of: Ahmad Shadid von O.Xyz
The semiconductors achieved a rare liberation from the aggressive mutual tariffs of US President Donald Trump, however the relief is symbolic at best. Most semiconductors enter the USA in servers, GPUs, laptops and smartphones.
The finished goods remain strongly depicted, some with duties of as much as 49%. The liberation looks politically good, but offers little practical advantages. The DGX systems from NVIDIA, that are of crucial importance for the training of advanced AI models, don’t fall under the excluded HTS codes. Nvidia could pay effective tariffs with 40% with these necessary components. Such costs threaten critical AI infrastructure projects across the country.
Halver conductor duties can affect the goal of the Chip Act. The law promised ten billion dollars of subsidies to support domestic chip production. However, advanced lithographic machines – key equipment from countries akin to the Netherlands and Japan – are exposed to twenty% to 24% tariffs. Ironically, tariffs which are alleged to increase American production increase the prices of essential manufacturing devices.
The impact of latest tariffs already slowed progress in critical supply chains – in addition to generative AI and enormous voice models of sectors akin to finance and defense gain dynamics. Delays or increases in costs could turn out to be the technological advantage of America.
Indirect costs undermine exceptions for AI
Modern semiconductor supply chains are global and highly integrated. An exemption from raw silicon means nothing if servers, GPUs and other finished products are exposed to steep tariffs. The tariffs not directly increase costs and eliminate the competitive advantage from domestic production.
The indirect tariff costs are disproportionately hard on high-end systems. The effect returns through AI model training, expansion and necessary infrastructure projects and slowed down the dynamics of the industry.
Sackase tariff stops the investments
So far it is obvious that the US president's collective bargaining plan doesn’t follow conventional economic trends or a calculated strategy. The uncertain tariff situation is putting the investment decisions in all the technology sector. Companies need predictable costs to justify large investments. The ongoing volatility of the tariff prevents them from signing resources for brand new data centers and manufacturing lines.
This reflects the chaos of the 2020 supply chain. At that point, uncertainty led massive cancellations and slowed down the recovery of the industry for years. If the tariff is sustained, we could see similar waves of cancellation in 2025. This would further exacerbate existing and sales problems within the semiconductor sector.
The domestic production just isn’t optimal
The border argument for these tariffs is that they need to increase domestic production. However, they do little to advertise real domestic semiconductor production. Despite the subsidies after the Chips Act, most US semiconductor firms still depend on international foundries for manufacturing. Instead, they’re exposed to increased equipment and operating costs.
Youngest: How trade wars affect stocks and crypto
The concept that the tariffs promote domestic production ignores the fact of the worldwide semiconductor production. The costs increase all along the road and convey American firms slightly disadvantaged as an alternative of offering protection.
AI projects are exposed to an increased risk
The blockchain and crypto sector, especially AI-controlled projects, also feel the pinch. The projects depend heavily on GPU and high-performance servers to validate transactions and perform decentralized AI calculations. Increased hardware costs affect profitability and growth, which can stop the innovation in blockchain applications.
AI developments have just begun to extend the pace within the blockchain and web3 area. The industry only recorded an increased interest of investors and VCS a yr ago. So you continue to have closer budgets. However, increased costs can result in stagnation. We could see how innovators and developers leave the market. The Ripple effect extends over the overall technology sector and will endanger future digital economies.
In addition, this cost pressure has a disproportionate effect on startups and smaller technology firms. Industry giants can absorb additional expenses, but progressive, smaller actors are exposed to existential threats. This dynamic risk, suppresses the innovation at the fundamental level and all the Tech ecosystem harms.
What to expect
Semiconductors have temporarily escaped direct tariffs, however the liberation offers little use. The tariffs proceed to use finished products and control the indirect costs in all the industry. Instead of strengthening domestic production, these tariffs create economic paralysis, critical infrastructure projects and threatening America's lead in AI innovation. Political decision -makers must recognize these realities and adapt their approach before irreversible damage to the country's technological future is caused.
Opinion of: Ahmad Shadid von O.Xyz.
This article serves general information purposes and shouldn’t be thought to be legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions which are expressed listed here are solely that of the creator and don’t necessarily reflect the views and opinions of cointelegraph or don’t necessarily represent them.
